Feds to save Swinomish Channel from silting over

The Swinomish Channel would have become impassable as early as 2015 without dredging, a study found.

The Swinomish Channel will get the dredging it needs to avoid becoming impassable, thanks to almost $2.3 million in federal funding allocated for the work.

The channel was expected to silt over by 2015 without dredging, putting hundreds of jobs at risk and making it inaccessible to thousands of boaters who use it annually to get to and from the San Juan and Gulf islands.

But funding for the dredging was included in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ work plan for 2012, which was provided to Congress this week. That was welcome news to Patsy Martin, executive director of the Port of Skagit.

“The Swinomish Channel is a vital inland marine waterway for this region,” she said. “Over 500 jobs depend directly on that waterway as a transportation corridor. It must be maintained.”

In recent months a coalition including the Port of Skagit, the town of La Conner, Skagit County, the nonprofit Pacific Northwest Waterways Association, state lawmakers, Indian tribes and a few local businesses has been working together to secure funding to dredge the channel.

Martin said Rep. Rick Larsen (D-Lake Stevens) has been “very, very supportive” of those efforts. On Tuesday, Larsen’s office issued a press release emphasizing his support for funding the Swinomish work.

“This funding is a major boost for Western Skagit County, which depends on the Swinomish Channel as an economic driver,” Larsen said in a statement.

“The channel is overdue for maintenance, but this substantial investment will make sure it is fully dredged this year. I am pleased the Army Corps has recognized the value of this investment.”

In late December, the Army Corps, which is responsible for maintaining the channel, received $30 million in additional funding to maintain small harbors around the country. But given the Swinomish’s relatively low amount of commercial traffic, there was concern that dredging the waterway might be put off in favor of other projects.

Boaters have been reporting shoaling in the Swinomish Channel for months, leading the U.S. Coast Guard to include a regular warning about traversing the waterway in its Local Notice to Mariners.

Kristin Meira, executive director of the Pacific Northwest Waterways Association, said the group was “elated” to learn of the funding.

“The Swinomish Channel has been a high priority for our association,” she said. “This funding will restore critical access for commercial, recreational and tribal users of the waterway.”

The 11-mile artificial channel, which connects Padilla Bay in the north to Skagit Bay in the south, was completed in 1937. It is authorized to a depth of minus 12 feet below mean lower low water, but silts in quickly from heavy sedimentation and must be dredged at least every three years to prevent it from filling in.

The channel was last dredged in 2008 and was due for additional dredging last year. In the past, the dredging has been included in the Army Corps’ budget. But the Corps began restricting funding to projects with more than 10 million tons of waterborne commerce a year, and the Swinomish Channel did not meet that requirement.

A 2010 study commissioned by the Port of Skagit found that without dredging, the channel will fill in to a depth of minus two feet at the north end and the same depth in the south end by 2019. That would render the waterway impassable for virtually all vessels and potentially causing the loss of more than 500 jobs in the Skagit Valley, according to the study.

The dredging is expected to be done sometime during a “fish window” — a period of least impact for fish — between July 16 of this year and Feb. 14, 2013.

9 Responses to Feds to save Swinomish Channel from silting over

  1. H2bid November 5, 2016 at 12:36 am #

    Good news for Construction and Dredging

  2. Laurie coco Lyon March 16, 2012 at 9:41 pm #

    Great news for sure! I think dredging starts in July.

  3. Linda February 13, 2012 at 4:00 pm #

    Will the channel be shut down any time during the dredging?

  4. Linda Scadron-Wattles February 13, 2012 at 3:53 pm #

    What does this mean about using the channel. Will it be shut down any time during the dredging?

  5. Bill Haimes February 10, 2012 at 12:27 pm #

    The sad fact is that it required congressional influence to get this done. The Formula for funding is based on commercial traffic but fails when silting is involved. Commercial traffic will avoid shoaling areas and us make the volume lower each year. Congress authorized this project and most others like it nationwide. Funding for maintainance of authorized deapths should be the basic building blocks of the Corps’ budget. We neglect our infrastructure at great peril. Look at the Interstate System. Federal gas tax monies are spent to help out states and counties and the Federal System falls apart. Waterways are getting the same treatment. The Federal Harbor Maintenance Tax is sitting unspent in the Treasury to either make the deficit look smaller or being diverted to other uses.

  6. thom permenter February 9, 2012 at 5:36 pm #

    Could you send me the picture of the Tolly with the hardtop that accompanies this article? I’m planning a hardtop for out Tolly and it would help me.

  7. Richard6218 February 8, 2012 at 1:08 pm #

    Well, you never know what the feds will come up with next. The last news from Rick Larsen’s office (November 2011) was that it was highly unlikely that Congress would provide any funding for Swinomish Channel for 2012 or for the foreseeable future. The crux of the issue was that this funding is an earmark, which is taboo in Congress these days due to the congressional earmark ban. This left me believing that doomsday would soon be upon us and I was preparing to exit LaConner for more secure moorage elsewhere. This is the best news of the year, so now I can wind down my search for other moorage. MIRACLES CAN (AND DO) HAPPEN!

  8. RavenTom February 8, 2012 at 10:23 am #

    Definitely great news. It has become so bad that I don’t dare sail out of the south end of the channel, and have seen several boats aground there, so this is a big relief to all who travel the “inside passage” via La Conner.

  9. Herb Stark February 8, 2012 at 5:01 am #

    Great News!!

Leave a Reply